DESPITE recent advances in the
containment and treatment of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome around the world, Nigeria appears to be
losing the battle against the dreaded disease. Rather than witness a
decline, as is the case in other parts of the world, new cases of
infection have been on the rise, thus making a mess of the global
prospects of a total eradication of the disease, which is actually
eradicable, even if not yet curable.
The
United Nations, at its 70th General Assembly in New York this year, set
a 2030 target to end the spread of the disease. Recent figures released
by the Nigerian authorities, however, paint a gloomy picture, which, if
not addressed urgently, could become a recipe for disaster. While the
National Agency for the Control of AIDS states that Nigeria has the
highest number of children born with HIV/AIDS, the National AIDS/STIs
Control Programme of the Federal Ministry of Health released statistics
showing that 115,688 Nigerians tested positive for the virus in the
first half of this year.
Added to this dire situation is a
warning from the Federal Government that donor countries, including the
United States, might withdraw their financial support for the treatment
programme in Nigeria by next year. Nothing could be more dreadful for a
country that pays only lip service to health care delivery, where the
rich and those who can afford it rush abroad for medical attention even
for ailments as minor as a headache or a sprained ankle.
Details of the ministry’s report
showed that the 115,888 unfortunate Nigerians were part of a
counselling and testing programme that involved 2,871,025 people around
the country. This should send the alarm bells ringing for the
authorities. If a testing programme involving just 2,871,025 people
could produce 115,888 new positive cases, what happens if the scope had
been much wider? Besides, this is a country with a population estimated
at over 170 million. What is the implication for a country whose
statistics are not usually reliable?
This development makes mincemeat
of the often peddled claim that there are about 3.5 million Nigerians
living with HIV/AIDS, second in prevalence rate only to South Africa in
the world. The view that the figure could be grossly understated is also
supported by the fact that the country has the highest number of
children born with the virus, which is also another embarrassment in
itself, given that transmission from mother to child is easily
preventable.
However, the failure of the
mother-to-child transmission programme is not a recent development as it
has been consistently so for some years now. A 2013 United Nations
report, for instance, did not mince words in saying so. “Nigeria has the
largest number of children acquiring HIV infection, nearly 60,000 in
2012 – a number that has remained unchanged since 2009,” the report
said. An official of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention,
Margaret Lampe, had also said last year that the number of people living
with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria had increased by almost 500,000 in three
years, just as the number of deaths related to the virus claimed 217,148
lives within the same period.
Although HIV, as the name
implies, is a virus that attacks the human immune system, it does not
kill. It however compromises the ability of a person to fight off
diseases. By the time the attack on the immune system progresses to the
stage of AIDS, the patient becomes a victim of opportunistic diseases
that ordinarily could have been kept at bay. This natural progression
is, however, preventable by administering the anti-retroviral therapy,
which keeps down the viral load and allows a person living with the
virus to live a normal life.
As usual, the failure to make
progress in the areas of mother-to-child transmission and tangible
reduction in the number of new infections is traceable to the absence of
sufficient government support. For instance, of the estimated 3.5
million people living with HIV/AIDS, only 700,000 have access to ART,
according to Abdulrahman Momodu, the Chairman, the Board of Trustees,
Network of People Living With HIV/AIDS. This has been made possible
mainly by contributions of donor countries and agencies. Why has the
government not filled the gap of 2.8 million that is not covered by the
foreign sponsorship?
This is the problem that will be
encountered when this sponsorship is lost next year. But it should not
be the case; government at all levels owes it a duty to step up
involvement in this serious public health issue. Apart from subsidising
the cost of medication for those who cannot afford it, there is also the
need to raise the level of awareness among Nigerians, especially those
in the sexually active age bracket, who are also the most vulnerable.
Access to treatment plays a dual role of not only ensuring that those
infected with the virus do not come down with AIDS, it also reduces the
rate of transmission.
For the sexually active, the
message should be that of practising safe sex – avoidance of multiple
sex partners and unprotected sex. Sharing of sharp objects such as
hypodermic syringes, blade and barbing clippers should also be avoided.
Enlightenment campaign over the years has nosedived, but it is the most
potent weapon against HIV/AIDS. People should also endeavour to undergo
tests to know their status; it goes a long way in determining what step
to take next.
No comments:
Post a Comment